Nuclear and Atomic Physics

   

Microworld_76 Newton's World_15 XV. A.-m. Ampere and the Thermonuclear Problem

Authors: Leonov N.N.

The first "hydrogen" - "thermonuclear" bomb was created and tested in 1952. After that, immediately began work on the creation of controlled "thermonuclear" power reactors - power reactors on light nuclei. Almost seventy years have passed since then, but until now, apart from empty promises of creating an energy paradise on Earth, there are no real hints of success in solving this problem in the thermonuclear problem. The theory of nonlinear oscillations - TNО, after conducting its own investigation, discovered the reason for such long empty promises and real failures in the thermonuclear problem. This reason was formed two hundred years ago, with Ampere's erroneous interpretation of the result of the famous experiment of Oersted (1821). Due to Ampere's mistake, the physics of the microworld thoughtlessly refused to take into account the magnetic interactions between micro-objects. As a result, the reactions of fusion of light nuclei, which provide the release of thermonuclear energy in the Sun and in the "hydrogen" bomb, were misunderstood by physicists. The same reactions were incorporated into the scheme of building controlled "thermonuclear" reactors. A method for solving the "thermonuclear" problem was discovered by TNO when analyzing the causes of equally long failures in the "neutrino" problem [1].

Comments: 14 Pages. English and russian texts

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2020-11-19 18:56:10

Unique-IP document downloads: 138 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus