Authors: John F. Signus
Recently, Daoyu Zhang et. Al [1], Mona Ralker et. Al [2] and Mohit Singla et. al [3] have reported exceptional anomalies associated with the RaTG13 metagenomic dataset which was inconsistent with that of a real fecal sample. Despite extensive search, we are only able to isolate 2 datasets Other than RaTG13 itself, that possessed significant levels of non-adaptor repeat sequences and absence of bacteria in the context of “bat” and “fecal” or “virome”. Furthermore, the analysis of such datasets have revealed an established pipeline of which a viral sequence is “rehosted”—e.g. added to a metagenomic sample that originally did not contain such viral sequences. This raises serious questions to the legitimacy of RaTG13 genome and the associated Nature paper.
Comments: 37 Pages. Multiple alignment to all known viral genomes (at a sensitivity higher than NCBI analysis) made possible using the SERRATUS toolbox.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2020-10-21 08:53:45
Unique-IP document downloads: 975 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.