Statistics

   

Random Walks Are Not So Random, After All

Authors: Arturo Tozzi

Physical and biological phenomena are often portrayed in terms of random walks, white noise, Markov paths, stochastic trajectories with subsequent symmetry breaks. Here we show that this approach from dynamical systems theory is not profitable when random walks occur in phase spaces of dimensions higher than two. The more the dimensions, the more the (seemingly) stochastic paths are constrained, because their trajectories cannot resume to the starting point. This means that high-dimensional tracks, ubiquitous in real world physical/biological phenomena, cannot be operationally treated in terms of closed paths, symplectic manifolds, Betti numbers, Jordan theorem, topological vortexes. This also means that memoryless events disconnected from the past such as Markov chains cannot exist in high dimensions. Once expunged the operational role of random walks in the assessment of experimental phenomena, we take aim to somewhat “redeem” stochasticity. We suggest two methodological accounts alternative to random walks that partially rescue the operational role of white noise and Markov chains. The first option is to assess multidimensional systems in lower dimensions, the second option is to establish a different role for random walks. We diffusely describe the two alternatives and provide heterogeneous examples from boosting chemistry, tunneling nanotubes, backward entropy, chaotic attractors.

Comments: 9 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2020-10-01 10:42:20

Unique-IP document downloads: 285 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus