Authors: N. N. Leonov
Analysis of the "neutrino" problem has shown that the proton is obtained not in quantum fairy tales, but in reality, as a result of the collision of a neutron with a photon, electron-anti-electron dipole. This understanding of the transformation of a free neutron into a proton dispenses with the use of a fantastic “neutrino” that does not exist in the material World, revealing the real reasons for seventy years of experimental failures in the “neutrino” problem. Analysis of the "thermonuclear" problem has shown that the quantum understanding of nuclear fusion in the Sun and in the "hydrogen" bomb with the release of huge "thermonuclear" energy is wrong. Therefore, this understanding of productive fusion reactions, taken as the basis for the operation of controlled power reactors on light nuclei, led to fruitless experimental attempts in the "thermonuclear" problem. Analysis of the "neutrino" problem made it possible to understand that real "cold" nuclear fusion really exists. It does not need to overcome the electrical barrier, since such a barrier does not exist in "cold" fusion. The magnetic barrier, in comparison with "hot" fusion, is as ridiculous as 13.65keV. "Cold" fusion is sequential neutron-photon fusion. Using the example of a "hydrogen" bomb, the productive work of "cold" fusion from a "thermonuclear" charge of a "hydrogen" bomb of unstable, instantly decaying, with the release of "thermonuclear" energy, 5Li and 8Ве nuclei is described.
Comments: 17 Pages. English and russian texts
Download: PDF
[v1] 2020-07-31 10:51:11
Unique-IP document downloads: 134 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.