Mind Science

   

Three Paradoxes of Thought

Authors: Tamas Lajtner

There are three paradoxes that summarize the working method of thought. 1) “Your thoughts change even when they do not change.” 2) “If you are thinking today what you thought yesterday, you are already thinking something else.” 3) ”In order to remain in one place you should run.” To understand the three paradoxes of thought, we have to understand what thought is. Thought is force. This force is a real force that makes impacts on living and inanimate, e.g. thought force creates the brain’s electromagnetic signals. The existence of thought force can be captured by appropriate mechanical and electronic devices, where thought power and energy can be also measured. This study presents some values of thought power and energy measured by the first electric Thought Power Meter in the world. Knowing these values, using devices like this it is possible to control objects like computer, switch on the wall etc. by thought force. The mainstream science refuses to accept the existence of thought force. In the second part of the study a short physics explanation is given that describes how thought force works. This physics necessarily goes beyond mainstream physics giving new definition of time and space. Thought force is in a given size range. Like all forces, thought force also creates its own counterforce. (Thought force itself can also be a counterforce of other forces.) There is no way to understand how thought works without accepting the human experience on thought’s counterforce. The counterforce and other forces in this size range can be created by lining and inanimate (non-living). Saying this, thought force can be created with and even without brains. This new recognition causes the three paradoxes of thought.

Comments: 41 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2020-07-07 14:58:24
[v2] 2020-07-25 10:59:26

Unique-IP document downloads: 486 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus