Astrophysics

   

Weak Equivalence Principle Violations for Stars Gravitation the Hint from Visual Binaries Data Preliminary Analysis. Implications for Dark Matter Search.

Authors: Dmitriy S. Tipikin

The way the stars in Galaxy are weighted relies heavily on the weak equivalence principle (Third Kepler Law). This law was verified in Solar System for baryonic matter – the planets and satellites rotating around the Sun. No deviations from this law was found (assuming the GR corrections). However, the Sun has a lot of non-baryonic matter inside (the photons are trapped inside for millions of years, slowly progressing toward the surface). The gravitation properties of such non-baryonic matter were never carefully investigated: unfortunately the Sun is not a binary star and gravitational attraction of two stars in the solar system was never checked. Observations of visual binaries may help to check the validity of the third Kepler law for stars motion. Re-analysis of the old data (1972) on binaries gives a hint that the slope of the mass-luminosity relation (the best way to measure the distant star) depends upon the choice of stars. This unusual observation may hint onto the violation of third Kepler Law for stars dynamic. If confirmed on large databases, this observation may resolve the dark matter problems: the stars are heavier than expected and gravitationally much heavier than expected and it may lead to re-evaluation of the mass of galaxies and as a consequence to elimination of the dark matter hypothesis for galaxies rotation.

Comments: 7 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2020-05-26 10:58:57

Unique-IP document downloads: 231 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus