Quantum Physics

   

Towards Realism Interpretation of Wave Mechanics Based on Maxwell Equations in Quaternion Space and Some Implications, Including Smarandache’s Hypothesis

Authors: Victor Christianto, Florentin Smarandache, Yunita Umniyati

From time to time, some eminent physicists commenced to ask: What is the reality behind quantum mechanical predictions? Is there a realism interpretation of Quantum Physics? This paper is intended to explore such a possibility of a realism interpretation of QM, based on a derivation of Maxwell equations in Quaternion Space. In this regards, we begin with Quaternion space and its respective Quaternion Relativity (it also may be called as Rotational Relativity) as it has been discussed in several papers including [1]. The purpose of the present paper is to review our previous derivation of Maxwell equations in Q-space [17], with discussion on some implications. First, we will review our previous results in deriving Maxwell equations using Dirac decomposition, introduced by Gersten (1999). Then we will shortly make a few remark on helical solutions of Maxwell equations, Smarandache’s Hypothesis and possible cosmological entanglement. Further observations are of course recommended to refute or verify some implications of this proposition.

Comments: 7 Pages. This paper has been accepted and published by AIP Conference Proceedings 2234, 040008 (2020).

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2020-05-19 09:57:37

Unique-IP document downloads: 195 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus