General Science and Philosophy

   

A Hypothesis on a Falsely Perceived Superiority of Men Versus Women Throughout Human History

Authors: Andrei Lucian Dragoi

This paper proposes a hypothesis on a falsely perceived superiority of men versus women along with the history of humanity: in short, men were falsely perceived as “superior to women” along with the human history NOT ONLY BECAUSE of their generally stronger bodies (and false-hypothetically superior intelligence and/or creativity), but ALSO POSSIBLY BECAUSE the semen (/seminal fluid) of men (and all known males from various animal species) is visible to the human eye and that may have created the FALSE impression that ONLY men possess “creative seed” and women are just “soil”-like passive containers which only assure the favorable conditions for that creative seed to generate a fetus/child; this hypothesis may also explain why various Gods (from various religions) who possess the power of creation are represented as males, not females. This paper continues the work of other past articles/preprints of the same author in philosophy.

Comments: FalseSupOfMen - version 1.0 - 22.04.2020 - 1 A4 page

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2020-04-22 12:22:12

Unique-IP document downloads: 173 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus