Relativity and Cosmology

   

General Relativity Light Speed Limit to Escape Velocity

Authors: David Grant Taylor

Classic General Relativity [GR] equations define distortion from an undistorted observation Perspective. Time distortion||Boson Slowdown from the Relativistic Perspective [RP] would reduce Time for any event, including movement, so the RP velocity would be distorted upward. Current interpretation of the Classic GR Time equation is incomplete. It presumes no limit to escape velocity. Even though escape velocities higher than c mean the distortion would be imaginary because it was the square root of a negative number. Imaginary Time is both incompletely defined and has no confirmable laboratory or observational evidence. This paper reasons equations that add logic||mathematic arguments for GR that do not predict imaginary distortions. The equations have been table confirmed to the originals to 2000 decimal places for velocities ranging from |1.000~000E-500m/s| to |(c-(1.000~000E-50))m/s|. The rephrased GR Time distortion equation argues Gravity Boson slowdown limits REAL escape velocity to c so there are never imaginary Time distortions. It also reasons additional equations show what that RP velocity would be in Real values. The c limit would mean Schwarzschild Objects never reach an imaginary state. The Singularity model defined in current in current Cosmological Theory would not deny fundamentals in General Relativity Theory.

Comments: 12 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2020-03-20 14:51:13

Unique-IP document downloads: 154 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus