Authors: Andrei Lucian Dragoi
This paper proposes a new definition of the Newtonian/ universal gravitational constant (aka “big G”) which is stated to be very plausibly not a true constant, but only a composite quasi-constant depending on a slightly variable speed of gravity (which is stated to be very close to the speed of light in vacuum [c] defined as the maximum speed limit of any elementary particle allowed in our universe), to which big G is directly proportional) and a very high energetic/massic linear density of vacuum produced by evanescent/off shell virtual particle-antiparticle pairs (to which G is inversely-proportional): this redefinition brings a natural solution of integrating speed of gravity in the big G scalar. This paper also proposes a variable (energy/length scale-dependent) electro-gravitational resistivity of vacuum (EGRV) determining both a variable (energy/length scale-dependent) quantum big G and the known running coupling constant of the electromagnetic field. In conclusion, this article offers a "patch" for Einstein's General relativity (EGR), Newtonian gravitational theory (NGT) and quantum gravity theory (QGT) which all use the classical empirical big G as a kind of gravitational coupling constant in their equations. This paper continues (from alternative angles of view!) the work of other past articles/preprints of the same author.
Comments: (EGRV - version 1.0 - 4.03.2020 - 5.5 A4 pages excluding references)
Download: PDF
[v1] 2020-03-15 08:28:13
Unique-IP document downloads: 146 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.