Social Science

   

Reviewing the Reviewers: a Case Study of the Diocesan Review Board of the Catholic Diocese of Dallas

Authors: Alee Corrales

Compared to other Catholic Dioceses in metropolitan areas in the United States, the Catholic Diocese of Dallas is taking a less-transparent approach to child sexual abuse allegations made internally. The main objective of the Diocesan Review Board of the Diocese of Dallas is to make recommendations to the Bishop of Dallas regarding child sexual abuse allegations. Therefore, this research will seek to address the following: What is the structure and function of the Diocesan Review Board of the Diocese of Dallas, and how can the procedures of the Diocesan Review Board reviewing allegations of child sexual abuse be made more transparent? Due to the autonomy of each Diocesan Review Board, there is a need for this research in the academic community because it identifies policies and practices of the Diocesan Review Board in Dallas, which can then be utilized to establish a baseline between other Catholic Dioceses and, perhaps, even lead to an analysis of best practices and implementations of Diocesan Review Boards. With a contextual section explaining Canon Law and government statutes, a literature review of scholarly sources discussing diocesan review boards, and methodology of the proposed research, this thesis proposal makes evident there is a need to further investigate the Diocesan Review Board of the Diocese of Dallas.

Comments: 15 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2020-01-21 14:45:54

Unique-IP document downloads: 175 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus