Authors: Norman Graves
The assumption that angular momentum is quantized underpins all of quantum theory. The assumption is at best questionable and most likely false since it violates the tenets of the scientific method.A new model is proposed for the hydrogen atom which does not rely on this assumption and is based instead on a combination of a sampling process and special relativity. It is postulated that certain orbital velocity terms are themselves affected by relativity. This leads to a planetary model for the atom in which the electron orbits at near light speed and at a constant radius independent of energy level, thus obviating the need for changes of radius with energy level and the attendant changes in potential energy. The atom is no longer seen as a nebulous cloud, but as a particle in the conventional sense.The model provides explanations for many of the incomprehensible phenomena associated with current theories. The dynamics involved are recognizably those of Newton and Einstein. It provides a simple mechanical explanation for the discrete energy levels of the atom, why synchrotron radiation does not occur, the nature of the fine structure constant and of zero point energy and the reason why Planck’s constant is a constant. It does so under a single set of physical laws and so effectively unites classical and quantum mechanics.
Comments: 80 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2017-04-14 04:42:54
[v2] 2023-10-28 19:01:25
[v3] 2024-01-08 16:53:05
[v4] 2024-04-04 14:27:18
Unique-IP document downloads: 472 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.