Digital Signal Processing

   

Dynamic Test Case Design Scenario and Analysis of Module Testing Using Manual vs. Automated Technique

Authors: Vishwa Nath Maurya, Rajender Kumar Bathla, Avadhesh Kumar Maurya3, Diwinder Kaur Arora

Present paper deals with problems of software testing. Software can be tested either manually or automatically. The two approaches are complementary: automated testing can perform a huge number of tests in short time or period, whereas manual testing uses the knowledge of the testing engineer to target testing to the parts of the system that are assumed to be more error-prone. Despite of this contemporary, tools for manual and automatic testing are usually different, leading to decreased productivity and reliability of the testing process. Auto test is a testing tool that provides a “best of both worlds” strategy: it integrates developers’ test cases into an automated process of systematic contract-driven testing. This allows it to combine the benefits of both approaches while keeping a simple interface, and to treat the two types of tests in a unified fashion: evaluation of results is the same, coverage measures are added up, and both types of tests can be saved in the same format. In this paper, our objective is to discuss the importance of automation tool; associated to software testing techniques in software engineering. We provide introduction of software testing and describe the case tools along with solution of software testing problem which leads to a new approach of software development known as software testing in the wide field of Information Technology

Comments: 22 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2014-05-07 05:09:02

Unique-IP document downloads: 541 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus