Relativity and Cosmology

   

On the Lorentz Transformations

Authors: John Shim

This paper examines Einstein’s 1905 derivation of the Lorentz transformations using the average time of travel of a light pulse in opposite directions. It shows that the derivation has significant errors, produces a relationship between the coordinate values that does not exist, and that a more careful examination of his example implies very different characteristics of the velocity of light than those claimed. It also points out that more general derivations which do not address specific measurement conditions cannot be judged as to their applicability. The paper shows that Einstein’s assertion of the independence of the shape of a spherical light pulse from the choice of the inertial reference frame of measurement is inconsistent with the known behavior of the photon. It further notes the impossibility of proving a general set of coordinate transformations, which would require a knowledge of all possible present and future coordinate measurement methods. It gives an example of a photon-emitting clock moving between two photon detectors, for which the transformations of the time of travel of the clock are consistent neither with the Lorentz nor the Galilean transformations.

Comments: 10 Pages. publication pending in the Hadronic Journal

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2014-01-20 19:13:49
[v2] 2014-03-18 20:37:21
[v3] 2014-05-21 11:51:41

Unique-IP document downloads: 322 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus