Isaac Newton’s ‘bucket argument’ was designed to show that true rotational motion could be defined only with respect to absolute space and not with respect to surrounding macrobodies, whatsoever states of motion they have. Even if the whole universe (surrounding a bucket of water on the earth's surface) rotates about it, the water surface in the bucket will remain flat, unless the bucket itself has a true spin motion with respect to absolute reference. Further mathematical analysis pointed towards a real action by an imaginary ‘centrifugal force’. It is not logical for imaginary efforts to cause real action. Analysing the actions of 3D matter particles in water (in a rotating bucket in a universal medium) by additional work associated with them (instead of the equilibrium of ‘forces’ on it) can give a logical explanation of actions without using imaginary ‘centrifugal force’. All conclusions expressed in this article are from the book ‘MATTER (Re-examined)’ [1]. For details, kindly refer to the same.