As of 2012, and put in a journal in 2013, Dyson came up with criteria as to the Gertsenshtein process in photon-graviton coupling, with criteria as to the likelihood as to if the Gertsenshtein process actually can occur. This methodology is applied to a small spatial geometry as to Tokamak’s generating external to the GW detector GW which are measured in a GW detector with a 100% probability of Gertsenshtein coupling of gravitons and photons, if there is a magnetic field of magnitude 10 to the 9th power, Gauss inside the GW detector. For a Tokamak generating GW measured by a new prototype GW detector, which has a strong magnetic field contained within the GW detector. We propose this form of arrangement due to a misunderstanding by Dyson as to the analysis of GW , which can be measured. If a GW detector has a very strong magnetic field, with weak magnetic field outside the GW detector, then the long distance approximations by Dyson do not hold and the problem, by default is far simpler than what Dyson proposed. Furthermore, we will in the conclusion allude to the Gertsenshtein GW – magnetic field interaction within the detector, which generates photons as less efficient in photonic signal production to another process which is listed in this manuscript. Finally the analysis of using the Earth surface area as a GW detector for solar produced Gravitons is unnecessary and scarcely believable as to there allegedly being 1 detected graviton out of 10 to the 43rd power number of Gravitons, in a ‘scattering experiment’ arrangement most similar to Mott Scattering which has no connections as to the Gertenshtein process. Finally the Gertenshtein process is not the last word in how GW and Gravitons interacting with a static magnetic field produce photon signals. These considerations have been muddled by Dyson due to his mistaken emphasis upon magnetic fields outside the GW detector. Hence, his unphysical assumption that a static magnetic field must be analyzed for kilometer long trajectories of Gravitons to a GW detector.