Authors: Michael J. Burns
This is verifiable by inspection of the geometry of gravitational fields that have been constructed expressly to behave as electromagnetic fields and their sources would. This geometry consists of a field of red partitions and a field of blue partitions that are orthogonal everywhere. These red and blue partitions are derived in my paper, “Draw the Metric!”. The sources for the two Kaluza-Klein component fields are two dilation horizons, that are at Cartesian right angles to each other (in a diagram including the ct axis), and both almost at light speed in opposite directions. These sources are conserved by the Bianchi identities, that apply to them as a matter of definition. The orientation of the source of the field of blue partitions is necessarily slightly superluminal, and with the superluminal dilation horizon being almost parallel to the surface of the blue partitions. And the source horizon for the red partitions is slightly subluminal. Together these components present a small gravitational field to objects that are stationary in spacetime, but a very large magnitude of field is apparent to other Kaluza-Klein fields. Furthermore, in the presence of other Kaluza-Klein fields, the Kaluza-Klein fields and sources polarize in a push-me-pull-you manner so that the response of a Kaluza-Klein charge is far in excess of what external spacetime curvature justifies. Neglecting vacuum physics still allows a Kaluza-Klein emulation of an electron to be very close to Planck scale.
Comments: 2 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2013-03-30 22:49:58
[v2] 2015-01-31 22:17:14
[v3] 2017-04-15 20:55:02
[v4] 2017-04-17 20:12:06
Unique-IP document downloads: 314 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.