Authors: John Shim
This paper examines Einstein’s derivations of the mass-energy relationship E=mc2 using the Lorentz transformations applied to a slowly accelerating charge of mass m, and also applied to a moving system emitting photons in opposite directions. In the first case, it is shown that Einstein’s use of the transformations is inconsistent with the classical definition of electrostatic force, F= qE, and that the expression given by Einstein for the kinetic energy of the charge due to its motion relative to the stationary system must be interpreted as a modification of the classical electrostatic interaction. In the second case, it is shown that Einstein’s conclusion does not follow from his example, and that the Lorentz transformations give no information about the kinetic energy of the excitation energy of a system due to its motion relative to a stationary coordinate system.
Comments: 6 Pages. published in the Hadronic Journal, 36(2) 2013
Download: PDF
[v1] 2013-03-29 19:22:40 (removed)
[v2] 2013-03-30 07:58:51 (removed)
[v3] 2013-03-30 09:41:32
[v4] 2013-06-16 22:15:36
[v5] 2014-05-21 14:43:33
Unique-IP document downloads: 391 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.